tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36592052.post3675159563060604787..comments2023-10-26T20:40:47.532+11:00Comments on opɯdʒɯlɯklɑr: … "We're talking about people's lives!"opoudjishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02106433476518749382noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36592052.post-353843256977603102010-06-12T10:10:41.612+10:002010-06-12T10:10:41.612+10:00"the urban class"? Is that what you call..."the urban class"? Is that what you call the bourgeoisie down under?Αγγελοςhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01817885314189709420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36592052.post-4498728344935985892010-05-11T04:11:59.936+10:002010-05-11T04:11:59.936+10:00I agree entirely with this article. I will add, t...I agree entirely with this article. I will add, though, that if it is true that the bank was a deathtrap, then those who made it so bear equal culpability with the assassins, without in any way reducing the guilt of those who set the fire. If Alice straps Bob to the front of her tank non-consensually just before her tank battle with Charlie, and Bob is killed, <i>both</i> Alice <i>and</i> Charlie are equally culpable and condemnable for Bob's murder.<br /><br />The fact of other places being equally unsafe deathtraps is not to the point, since this is about what actually happened at the bank, not what might have happened elsewhere. By the same token, talk of accidental death is inadmissible, there being no accidents during the commission of a felony.John Cowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11452247999156925669noreply@blogger.com